When I first started using Vue.js, I had mixed feelings. Coming from another framework (like React), Vue felt both familiar and unfamiliar at the same time. The syntax made sense, but things like v-for
instead of map()
made me question why Vue needed to be different.
But as I kept building, something clicked. Vue’s component-based architecture, reactive system, and powerful ecosystem started making my development experience smoother. In this post, I’ll walk you through the challenges I faced, the solutions I implemented, and why Vue eventually won me over.
My Vue Setup 🛠️
My project is built using Vue 3, powered by:
✅ Vite – Fast development server 🚀
✅ Pinia – Simple yet powerful state management
✅ Vue Router – Routing made easier (but still a bit tricky)
✅ TypeScript – Because type safety is life
While Vue does a lot of things right, I ran into a few challenges along the way. Let’s dive into them.
🚧 Challenges & How I Overcame Them
1️⃣ The Learning Curve 📚
Coming from a different framework, I had to unlearn some habits. The hardest part? Understanding Vue’s reactivity system:
ref()
andreactive()
for statewatch()
andwatchEffect()
for reactivitydefineProps()
anddefineEmits()
for component communication
At first, I compared Vue's watchEffect()
to React's useEffect()
, but once I got used to Vue’s reactivity model, I realized how intuitive it was.
🔥 Solution: Experimentation & Reading Docs
I kept experimenting, and Vue’s documentation is top-notch. If you’re new to Vue, play with its reactivity system in a small project—it will make a huge difference.
2️⃣ State Management: Pinia vs Vuex 🍍
Managing global state was something I dreaded, but Pinia made it much easier than Vuex. It supports TypeScript out of the box and has great DX (developer experience).
🛠️ Solution: Using Pinia
Here’s how I set up my cart store in Pinia:
import { defineStore } from "pinia";
import type { CartItem, Product } from "@/interfaces/product";
import { cartService } from "@/services/cart";
export const useCartStore = defineStore("cart", {
state: () => ({
items: [] as CartItem[],
loading: false,
error: null as string | null,
}),
getters: {
itemCount: (state) => state.items.reduce((total, item) => total + item.quantity, 0),
totalPrice: (state) => state.items.reduce((total, item) => total + item.price * item.quantity, 0),
},
actions: {
async fetchCart() {
try {
this.loading = true;
this.items = await cartService.getCart();
} catch (err) {
this.error = err instanceof Error ? err.message : "Failed to fetch cart";
} finally {
this.loading = false;
}
},
},
});
Why I love Pinia:
✅ Simpler than Vuex
✅ Supports TypeScript with auto-complete
✅ No boilerplate required
3️⃣ Routing Woes: Dynamic Routes & Nested Navigation 🛤️
Vue Router is great, but setting up dynamic routes and nested navigation was more complex than expected.
🤯 Challenge: Managing nested routes
Vue Router’s syntax felt less intuitive compared to Next.js. In Next.js, I could define routes using the file system, but in Vue, I had to explicitly define them.
✅ Solution: Vue Router Setup
Here’s how I set up dynamic routes:
import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from "vue-router";
import Home from "@/views/Home.vue";
import Product from "@/views/Product.vue";
const routes = [
{ path: "/", component: Home },
{ path: "/product/:id", component: Product, props: true },
];
const router = createRouter({
history: createWebHistory(),
routes,
});
export default router;
It works, but I still prefer the simplicity of Next.js’s file-based routing.
4️⃣ Performance Optimizations ⚡
With large datasets, I noticed unnecessary re-renders slowing things down.
🛠️ Solution: Fine-tuning performance
- Lazy loading components to reduce initial load time
- Optimizing reactivity by using
computed
properties instead ofwatch
when possible - Configuring Vue for better performance
import { createApp } from "vue";
import App from "@/App.vue";
const app = createApp(App);
app.config.performance = import.meta.env.DEV; // Enable performance tracking in dev
These small tweaks significantly improved render times in my app.
🚀 Vue: The Pros & Cons
✅ What I Love About Vue
✨ Component-based architecture – Easy to scale & reuse components
✨ Reactive data binding – Seamless UI updates when state changes
✨ Pinia for state management – Simple & TypeScript-friendly
✨ Great ecosystem – Vite, Vue Router, Pinia, and more
❌ What Could Be Better
⚠️ Initial setup complexity – Setting up a Vue project with TypeScript & routing can feel overwhelming
⚠️ State management overhead – Pinia is great, but sometimes overkill for small projects
⚠️ Performance considerations – Need to be mindful of reactivity & re-renders in large apps
Final Thoughts: Vue Grew on Me 💚
At first, I was skeptical. Vue’s syntax differences, routing complexities, and state management learning curve frustrated me. But after spending more time with it, I began to appreciate its simplicity and power.
Would I choose Vue for my next project? Absolutely—especially for small to medium-sized applications. Vue provides the right balance of flexibility, performance, and developer experience.
That said, Next.js still wins in terms of routing simplicity.